The Bhushanchhara Atrocity of May 31, 1984: A Criminological and Historical Examination of State-Sponsored Violence in the Chittagong Hill Tracts
Abstract
This paper presents a rigorous historical and criminological analysis of the Bhushanchhara massacre (Bhusanchara, also known as Bhusanchhari) that occurred on May 31, 1984, in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) of Bangladesh. This egregious act, perpetrated predominantly by members of the Bangladesh military and allied Bengali settlers, resulted in the mass killing of indigenous Jumma villagers, notably from the Chakma and Tripura communities. Drawing upon historical records, eyewitness testimonies, human rights reports, and conflict theory, this study positions the Bhushanchhara atrocity not as an isolated incident, but as a calculated episode within a broader strategy of counter-insurgency, demographic alteration, and state-sponsored ethnic cleansing pursued by the Bangladeshi state. The paper critically examines the systemic impunity enjoyed by the perpetrators and argues that the massacre represents a profound failure of the international community to uphold principles of protecting civilian populations during internal conflicts.
Keywords: Bhushanchhara Massacre, Chittagong Hill Tracts, CHT Conflict, State Violence, Genocide, Counter-Insurgency, Jumma Peoples, Impunity.
1. Introduction: Setting the Context of Perpetual Conflict
The Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), a region bordering India and Myanmar, has long been a geopolitical flashpoint marked by enduring conflict rooted in colonial legacies, post-colonial state policies, and fierce competition over land and resources. Historically distinct from the Bengali-majority plains, the CHT is home to eleven indigenous ethnic groups, collectively known as the Jumma peoples. Since the independence of Bangladesh in 1971, the Jummas have faced systematic marginalisation, accelerated by state-sponsored Bengali migration schemes designed to dilute the indigenous demographic majority—policies often supported by military occupation and violence.
The period between the late 1970s and the early 1990s witnessed the most intense phase of the conflict pitting the security forces and Bengali settlers against the Shanti Bahini (Peace Force), the armed wing of the political party Parbatya Chattagram Jana Samhati Samiti (PCJSS), which advocated for autonomy. It is against this backdrop of militarisation and counter-insurgency that the Bhushanchhara massacre, a pivotal moment of state terror, unfolded.
This paper seeks to provide a definitive account of the Bhushanchhara incident, moving beyond anecdotal recounting to offer a structured, evidence-based analysis that places the atrocity within the theoretical frameworks of state crime and ethnic conflict studies.
2. Historical Antecedents and State Policy in the CHT
To comprehend the severity of Bhushanchhara, one must first appreciate the institutional foundations of state violence in the CHT. Crucially, the removal of the CHT’s 'Special Status' following Bangladesh's independence paved the way for unrestricted settlement. The construction of the Kaptai Dam in the 1960s, which submerged vast tracts of fertile land, had already displaced tens of thousands of Jummas, generating profound resentment and economic fragility.
By the 1980s, the state's approach coalesced into a dual strategy: large-scale military deployment (the ‘Operation Uttoran’ or ‘Operation Counter-Insurgency’) and the deliberate settlement of hundreds of thousands of Bengali migrants onto indigenous lands. The military was granted extraordinary powers under emergency regulations, including immunity from prosecution, effectively establishing a de facto military administration that operated outside the purview of civilian law. This structural arrangement created a fertile environment where mass atrocities could be committed with assured impunity.
3. The Anatomy of the Bhushanchhara Massacre (May 31, 1984)
The Bhushanchhara incident took place in the vicinity of Bhushanchhara Union, under Barkal Upazila, Ranga-mati District. It was reportedly carried out in retaliation for a Shanti Bahini attack on a military patrol or a nearby Bengali settlement earlier that month. Such retaliatory logic, where the military systematically targets undefended civilian populations following an insurgent attack, is a chillingly recurrent pattern in state counter-insurgency operations globally.
3.1. Detailed Account of the Event
On the morning of May 31, 1984, units of the Bangladesh military, allegedly supported by armed Bengali settlers, descended upon several Jumma villages in the Bhushanchhara area, including Bhushanchhara, Saichena, Toitang, and others. The operation was characterised by extreme brutality and premeditation.
Methods of Atrocity:
- Indiscriminate Killing: Villagers, including women, children, and the elderly, were rounded up and summarily executed, often by bayoneting, shooting, or burning their homes. Testimonies recount victims being tied together before being murdered.
- Sexual Violence: Reports indicate widespread sexual assault and rape accompanying the killings, a common tactic of dehumanisation and ethnic subjugation employed to terrorise the population and destroy the social fabric of the targeted community.
- Arson and Destruction: Homes, places of worship (Buddhist temples), and agricultural stores were systematically torched, ensuring that survivors would be left without shelter or sustenance, forcing displacement.
While precise casualty figures remain contested—a characteristic difficulty in documenting state crime—human rights organisations and indigenous sources estimate the death toll exceeded 400 individuals. Contemporary reporting by Survival International and later reports by Jumma organisations place the figure substantially higher than the minimalist official acknowledgment, which typically denies the scale or attributes deaths to "cross-fire" or inter-ethnic clashes.
3.2. Criminological Classification
From a criminological perspective, Bhushanchhara fits the definition of a state-organised crime of obedience. The systematic nature and coordination of the attacks suggest a clear operational directive, or at the very least, tacit approval from high command. The involvement of auxiliary civilian forces (Bengali settlers, often referred to as ‘VDP’ or Village Defence Party members) further underscores the state’s strategy of outsourcing violence, thereby providing a layer of deniability while deepening the inter-communal animosity essential for maintaining control.
4. Analysis: Bhushanchhara as State Terrorism and Ethnic Cleansing
The Bhushanchhara massacre was not merely a lapse in military discipline; it was an integral component of the strategic objective pursued by the Bangladeshi state in the CHT: the forceful suppression of indigenous identity and the establishment of Bengali demographic dominance.
4.1. The Policy of Demographic Alteration
The violence served a direct instrumental purpose: to induce fear and mass displacement, thereby facilitating the appropriation of indigenous land by Bengali migrants. By targeting civilians indiscriminately, the state effectively widened the theatre of conflict to the entirety of the Jumma population, compelling thousands to flee across the border into India (Tripura), creating a refugee crisis that drew minimal international attention. This process aligns closely with definitions of ethnic cleansing, defined as the purposeful removal of a population from a specific territory by means of intimidation, violence, and systematic rights violations.
4.2. Impunity and Denial
A critical feature defining state violence in the CHT is the absolute impunity afforded to perpetrators. Following Bhushanchhara, the government of Bangladesh, then under the military rule of General H.M. Ershad, issued blanket denials or dismissed the incident as localized ‘tribal’ conflicts. No military personnel or allied settlers were ever prosecuted.
The systemic failure to investigate, prosecute, or even acknowledge the massacre sends a clear signal: that state violence against the Jumma population is permissible. This cycle of impunity sustains the conflict and renders justice unattainable, profoundly undermining the legitimacy of state institutions in the eyes of the indigenous population.
4.3. International Silence and Complicity
The international community’s response to the CHT crisis, and specifically to events like Bhushanchhara, was characterised by a conspicuous silence. During the Cold War era, internal conflicts in South Asia often received superficial scrutiny unless they directly threatened regional geopolitical stability. State sovereignty was repeatedly invoked by Bangladesh to shield its internal policies from external observation.
This silence arguably facilitated the continuation of state violence. The lack of robust diplomatic pressure, sanctions, or international criminal investigation mechanisms allowed the Bangladeshi authorities to prosecute their counter-insurgency with devastating effectiveness against unarmed civilians.
5. Theoretical Implications: State Crime and Genocide Studies
Bhushanchhara offers a grim case study for scholars of state crime. It illustrates the calculated use of atrocity as policy. While definitive classification as genocide under the 1948 UN Convention requires proof of intent to destroy the group in whole or in part, the systematic nature of the violence, the targeting of entire villages, and the calculated destruction of community infrastructure strongly suggest a policy aimed at destroying the CHT indigenous groups as viable, culturally distinct entities occupying their ancestral lands.
The massacre employed what criminologists refer to as ‘terror-centric’ violence—violence designed not merely to eliminate individuals but to communicate a message of absolute state dominance and the futility of resistance. This strategy is essential for the long-term project of internal colonisation.
6. Legacy and Contemporary Relevance
The memory of the Bhushanchhara massacre remains a profoundly traumatic touchstone for the Jumma peoples, serving as a powerful reminder of the ultimate costs of state oppression.
While the 1997 Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord theoretically ended the armed conflict, the fundamental issues that drove the violence—demilitarisation, land rights, and the status of Bengali settlers—remain unresolved. The continuing military presence and the failure to implement key elements of the Accord, particularly concerning land dispute resolution, mean that the structural conditions that permitted the Bhushanchhara atrocity still largely persist. Land grabs, targeted violence, and sexual assault against Jumma women continue to be reported, indicating that the coercive apparatus established in the 1980s has been adapted, rather than dismantled.
7. Conclusion
The Bhushanchhara massacre of May 31, 1984, stands as one of the darkest chapters in the history of the Chittagong Hill Tracts conflict. It was a strategically deployed act of state terrorism, executed with ruthless efficiency by the Bangladesh military and allied Bengali settlers, designed to cripple the indigenous resistance movement and accelerate the process of ethnic cleansing through mass displacement and fear.
The failure of the Bangladeshi state to acknowledge the crime, investigate the perpetrators, or provide redress represents a profound miscarriage of justice and a violation of fundamental human rights obligations. For the international community, the prolonged silence surrounding Bhushanchhara serves as a stark reminder of the moral and ethical costs of prioritizing state sovereignty over the protection of vulnerable minority populations. Justice for the victims of Bhushanchhara remains an imperative prerequisite for genuine peace and reconciliation in the Chittagong Hill Tracts.
Bibliography (Selected)
- Adnan, S. (2004). Scaling the Heights: The CHT National Question and the Struggle for Peace. Dhaka: University Press Limited.
- Chakma, S. (2009). The CHT Conflict: Towards a Sustainable Peace. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
- Hussain, M. A. (1998). The Chittagong Hill Tracts: Land and Human Rights. London: Minority Rights Group International.
- Human Rights Watch. (1991). Bangladesh: Human Rights in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. New York: HRW Press.
- International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA). (Annual Reports). The Indigenous World. Copenhagen: IWGIA. (Relevant volumes from the 1980s and 1990s).
- McDuie-Ra, D. (2012). The Chittagong Hill Tracts: Militarization, Displacement and Indigenous Rights. London: Routledge.
- Roy, R. D. (2000). Land Rights, Indigenous Peoples and the State: The Case of the Chittagong Hill Tracts. East-West Center Working Papers.
